Acoustical Ceiling Seismic Instructions

I came across some text that I am pretty sure is old:

ALL LAY-IN PANEL CEILINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CEILINGS AND INTERIOR SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATION (CISCA) MANUAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DIRECT-HUNG ACOUSTICAL TILE AND LAY-IN PANEL CEILINGS FOR ZONES 0 - 2.

Now, out-of-the-box MasterSpec only references CISCO in terms of pressurized plenums. Seismic installation references ASCE/SEI 7.

Googling the phrase, I came across a number of 5 digit section, plus some manufacturer provided specs that have it phrased differently.

I also came across the CISCA Seismic Construction Handbook (which refences seismic categories A-F.)

Looking for suggestions on updating this note.

Loretta: I’m glad you asked the question - it’s been sitting in the back of my mind and it is way past time for us to update our masters. The CISCA Handbook is still out there, updated to ASCE 7-10 at least. There is an ASTM E580 cited in UFGS 095100 2020. ASTM E580-20 still cites UBC and BOCA. I’d like to know about the MasterSpec writer’s decision to delete the CISCA reference in Part 3. The current MasterSpec is from 9/14 so is way overdue for an update. Part 3 does not cite an installation standard now, only referring to an assumed Delegated Design under Performance Requirements which strikes me as naive: how many small and modest sized projects in seismic zones require delegated seismic design by a PE, and why would those engineered seismic designs differ significantly from manufacturer and CISCA practices? I hope we can get some helpful comments here.

It’s technically only applicable to projects under their jurisdiction, but the California Division of the State Architect has a great handout with a pretty comprehensive set of standard notes and details for ceilings: https://www.dgs.ca.gov/-/media/Divisions/DSA/Publications/interpretations_of_regs/IR_25-2.pdf

Here in the Pacific Northwest we use the Northwest Wall and Ceiling Bureau’s Technical Document 401 ‘Suspension Systems for Acoustical Lay-In Ceilings Seismic Design Catagories D, E &F’.

It is available here: https://www.nwcb.org/uploads/1/3/4/3/134308777/401_revised_1218.pdf

This document is a little out of date and the NWCB is currently working to update it.

After a fair amount of googling around, I think this may be closing in on the updated phrasing. I think the current CISCA recommendations may now be published The Seismic Construction Handbook but I am waiting to hear back from them.

One of the challenges I have found is finding the current, correct publication title.

I emailed Armstrong, CISCA, and UGS. I heard back from Armstrong so far. (I am sure CISCA and UGS will get back to me.)

I cannot find a publication on the CISCA website called “Guidelines for Seismic Restraint of Direct-Hung Suspended Ceiling Assemblies–Seismic Zones 3 & 4.” There are publications called The Ceilings Handbook, and The Seismic Construction Handbook, either of which may contain the guidelines.

After googling around, I found a 2000 publication available at Builders Booksource. I also found an older version of ASTM E580 that appears to have incorporated it. (It is listed in its references.)
I found another reference published around 2012-2013

The NWCB Technical Document references CISCA Seismic Zones 3-4 but not where that is defined. (The other references are to specific publications; CISCA is just the organization.)

So.

Assuming I am correct about where this information is currently published, (pending a response from CISCA), possible updated phrasing could be:

Comply with recommendations for seismic installation as outlined in CISCAs The Seismic Construction Handbook for CISCA Zones 0-2.
(Or the applicable CISCA Seismic Zone.)

(Once I hear back from CISCA, I will probably purchase the applicable publication, but I want to wait until I know which one it is.)

FYI, the NWCB Document 401 that I mentioned earlier has been updated. You can find it here: https://www.nwcb.org/blog/2022-revisions-to-the-nwcb-401-document

David G/ Axt: That is very helpful. Also interesting that CISQA was taken out in the revision.

Thank you very much for sharing this!