Dave, that is a helpful link, thank you!
The Steel Door Institute has this to say (under SDI 127I-04):
"Some Architectural Specifications require frames in stud and drywall partitions to be filled with grout for sound deadening or to enhance structural integrity.
The STEEL DOOR INSTITUTE is opposed to this practice for the following reasons:
ANSI A250.8-2003 (also 1998) paragraph 4.2.2 and ANSI A250.11-2001 paragraph 2.2 both address the question of grouting frames. The paragraph cited in ANSI A250.8 gives a bit more information on the problems related to moisture in grout.
In drywall construction, this moisture has two places to go. It can soak into the drywall, potentially destroying its cohesive integrity and thus the ability to retain anchors or frame integrity, or it can leach downward where it will cause premature rusting of anchors, screws, stud connections, bottom of frames, etc.
Grouting does not appreciably afford any additional structural rigidity to the frame. As an example, slipon drywall frames have passed fire and hose stream tests, cycle tests, and in some cases impact tests without being grouted.
If the intention is for sound deadening, SDI 128-97 (Section 3) should be consulted. In addition, the same insulation as used between wall studs (generally lightly packed fiberglass) will serve as a sound deadener without the potential for damage to the frame or wallboard.
It is therefore the opinion of the STEEL DOOR INSTITUTE that grouting should never be specified for drywall construction."
I think this discussion should also persue the practice of back-coating the frames. That one has always been in our spec, but has been very difficult to get contractors to actually do. Most of the younger architectural staff are at a loss as to explain or justify it’s usefullness, and are more likely to waive it off as yet another antiquated practice.
Bruce, I’d love to see what your obviously well annotated specs say on the matter.
SDI says this (SDI 127J-04):
"Some Architectural Specifications require steel frames to be back-coated with a bituminous coating for corrosion protection or sound control. Bituminous is an archaic term for a coating or emulsion containing fibrous or
non-fibrous asphalt. Other than for a few selective uses unrelated to steel frames, it is not readily available. A more modern replacement for this material is automotive undercoating.
It is the recommendation of the STEEL DOOR INSTITUTE that this coating SHALL NOT be applied at the factory or any location other than the jobsite. The coating never fully dries; leaving a dark residue that can be transferred to the frame during transportation, storage, or handling prior to final installation.
ANSI A250.8-2003 (also 1998) limits factory applied coatings to either factory prime finish (2.1.3) or factory-applied finish paint (2.1.4).
For corrosion protection, ANSI A250.11-2001 paragraph 2.2 clearly states that the contractor responsible for installation
applies corrosion resistant coatings only where specified for anti-freezing agents in plaster or mortar.
For sound control purposes, it is less damaging to the frame finish and more expedient for the contractor responsible for installation to extend the insulation material used in the adjoining wall into the frame. This creates an
unbroken barrier to the passage of sound."