Thanks, guys.
My understanding was that it was something about 5 years as noted above, but I had heard 4 quoted before.
I also understood about the changes in fabrication that if (in whoever’s judgement) that changes something enough to impact performance that it requires retesting.
And of course, when a new standard is published, testing is required if the changes relate to performance requirements. And that there is a ‘grandfathering’ so to speak before they are required to do so. The major revision of the 2008 version using that as a guide, the manufacturers were given 3 years to comply, so its likely 3 years for anything since that was so major.
So, on this issue, I do have a searchable version of the pdf of the 2008 standard and the update package to 2011. I have run a search in it for “years” “year” and numerous other single words looking for something that would be talking about how many years a test was valid. Nothing.
The only thing that comes up is that the test must have a ‘retention date’ listed on it by the testing agency of not less than 4 years. This is a requirement imposed on the testing agency to retain a record of the test, its not anything to do with the validity of how long a test is good for. As a humorous note, the supplier of the windows for this project is trying to point to that length of time as how long the test is valid - and the testing agency has filled in 21 years as to how long they will retain the test !!
Anyway, it seems that the 2008 and 2011 versions of AAMA do not address the time for which the test is valid. Perhaps they state this in some other standard, or in some other publication. I will try to post a question to them to see what turns up and post what I find back here.
Right now, for this project, the tests were performed in 2011 under the 2008 standard, and our project was published in December of 2014 (Division 1 listing that standards shall be those current at the time of publication of the spec). That’s pretty close, so we are asking that the manufacturer either provide more current tests or that they provide a letter certifying that the tests are in compliance with AAMA requirements for the validity of the tests.
If anyone else comes up with something, post it here. Thanks!!
William