Wow, you must have had a strange experience as an in-house specifier. I am an in-house specifier - I know many independeents local and nationally.
And those you know in the profession that are internal, I can’t respect their reasons either.
Sleep: I find that I have no more nor less sleep than my counterparts have. However, I do recognize that they often get less sleep per night though on the whole that they come out ahead as they set their own work schedule and I don’t. Our office has core hours - I can adjust my arrival and departure time, but I have to be in the office no later than 9:30 and leave no earlier than 4:30 and total an 8 hour day. And I don’t get to sleep late or take a mid day nap if I was up all the previous night laboring over a project that needed special attention. But, that does not happen frequently because I manage my time pretty efficiently and I have the project managers and project architects trained. They understand well that if I say anything given me within the last 10 days of a project might not make it in, and the closer it gets the more likely it won’t. Independents often don’t have that luxury, though if you do the contract right you should. And schedule conflicts - that’s their problem. They are all trained and understand the limitation I place on due dates in close proximity and know they will have to talk to other project managers if they have a conflict. They can’t just dump it on me.
Vacations: Pardon me? Pehaps far and few between for some, but I know some who had no problems going out of the country for a couple weeks every year, or taking a month to visit Australia. I am elligible for 5 weeks a year given my time in the company. However, I seldom get to take that, I can’t take it all at once. When I do go, I am always taking my current projects that are expected to have issues with me to be able to answer via email any questions which I check once a day. Sometimes I miss a day.
Payments: I don’t recall that I have ever heard this expression about walking. But, companies do have a stronger obligation to pay their employees as opposed to their consultants.
Just another Architect: Really? Any in-house specifier who is just another architect “just an’t carryin’ enough sand”, to use an old-west saying. PMs and PAs and even principals may be just another architect. I know, they know, and I am treated openly and referenced to Owners and Contractors as much more than that. And god forgive the contractor or supplier that treats me as just another architect because I won’t - and they will regret it.
Independents have a good career and its a choice that you make for the style of practice and life choices you make.
But how many of you get to see work intimately with the CA process (as part of your specifier duties, not as a CA consultant) of every one of your projects. How many of you get to benefit from, or have to defend your work issues that arise during the construction process on a day to day basis. All that time you spent researching a given coating, curtain wall system, roofing system, what do you feel when its lost due to lack of understanding for a simple explanation that the architect was unable to give and did not want to bother the specifier because its beyond your scope…or just because you weren’t handy during a meeting. And for that, how many of you get to become involved directly with manufacturer’s of new or innovative products that you or the architect want to use - after the project when they come back to you to work out issues of how to better educate contractors or owners that either don’t understand or use incorrecct information to avoid the product.
That’s my day, guys, and I enjoy it very much. I wouldn’t trade being an independent over being an internal specifier any day - I would never want to be ‘just another consultant’ even if a very special one.
William