California Public Bid - Are 3 "Equivelent" Products Required by Law?

Paul, wouldn’t “Consultant approved alternate” place the responsibility for product acceptability squarely in your lap? The definitions given for “alternate” and “equal” seem to imply that the unnamed judge of performance, intent, etc - essentially the intent of “or equal” (which never in my experience has been stated or even implied as “the same in every respect”) - is the “Consultant”.

So to me “Consultant approved alternate” reads the same as “approved equal” and is just as restrictive.

While the conditions of the contract can clarify the rules followed on the project they cannnot ammend the PCC.

As I understand it most, if not all, structural engineers in California are in violation of the requirement to specify multiple products.

Wouldn’t it be great if some of the specifiers who work for government agencies got together, and tried bring order to the insanity of government specification practices?

Oh, that’s right; they did that about sixty years ago…